Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72423 (BOM)

PRADIP KERBA PATIL v. SUNIL JANARDAN MAHADESHWAR AND ANR.

ALP/550/2018 · 2025-12-01

Shri Shivkumar Dige

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

3-ALP-550-2018 (CR).DOC Harish IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL(PVT.) NO. 550 OF 2018 Pradip Kerba Patil ...Applicant Versus Sunil Janardan Mahadeshwar And Anr. ...Respondents WITH APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL(PVT.) NO. 553 OF 2018 Pradip Kerba Patil ...Applicant Versus Sunil Janardan Mahadeshwar And Anr. ...Respondents WITH APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL(PVT.) NO. 552 OF 2018 Pradip Kerba Patil ...Applicant Versus Sunil Janardan Mahadeshwar And Anr. ...Respondents WITH APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL(PVT.) NO. 551 OF 2018 Pradip Kerba Patil ...Applicant Versus Sunil Janardan Mahadeshwar And Anr. ...Respondents ------- Mr. Paras Yadav Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. S. S. Chaudhari, APP for the Respondent-State. ------- CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 1st DECEMBER, 2025 HARISH VITHAL CHAUDHARI Digitally signed by HARISH VITHAL CHAUDHARI Date: 2025.12.04 10:10:50 +0530 3-ALP-550-2018 (CR).DOC P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for Applicant and learned APP for the Respondent No.2-State. 2. Learned counsel for Applicant on instructions seeks leave to withdraw these Applications with liberty to file an Appeal before the learned Sessions Court as per the view of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case Celestium Financial Vs. Ghanasekaran Etc1. 3. Considering the submission of learned counsel for Applicant, Application is allowed to be withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 4. Application is dismissed and disposed of as withdrawn. 5. Learned Sessions Court shall consider the delay, if Appeal is filed as the Application was pending before this Court. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) 1 2005 SC 2099