IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 04TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1591 OF 2022 BETWEEN SRI.JAYARAJAN, S/O. LATE SRI. SWAMINATHAN, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/AT NO.7/80, 1ST FLOOR, HENNUR ROAD, 5TH CROSS, LINGARAJAPURAM, BANGALORE. ….Appellant (By Sri. Eugene Prabhu B and Nagaraja K.N, Advocates) AND 1. SMT. GOWRI W/O. SRI. JAYANTH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT NO.7/80, 1ST FLOOR, HENNUR ROAD, 5TH CROSS, LINGARAJAPURAM BANGALORE-560084. SRI. JAGANNATHAN, SINCE DECEASED REPRESENTED BY HIS LEGAL HEIRS. 2. MRS. SHAMEEN W/O. LATE JAGANNATHAN, AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS. 3. MR. UDAYA SURYA, S/O. LATE JAGANNATHAN AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS RFA.No.1591/2022 ----------------------- 2 4. MRS. MAHESHWARI W/O. LATE UDAYA CHANDRAN, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS. 5. MS.PRIYANKA, D/O. LATE UDAYA CHANDRAN AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS 6. MR. ABHISHEK S/O. LATE UDAYA CHANDRAN AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS. 7. MR. MAHENDRANATH S/O. LATE JAGANNATHAN AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 8. MR. YUGENDRANATHAN, S/O. LATE JAGANNATHAN, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS (ALL ARE PRESENTLY R/AT NO.560/66 INDIRA GANDHI SCHOOL BUILDING RAMAKRISHNA HEGDE NAGAR, BANGALORE-560077). SRI. PUSHPARAJ, SINCE DEAD REPRESENTED BY HIS LRS. 9. SMT. NIRMALA, W/O. LATE PUSHPARAJ, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 10. KUM. MAHESHWARI, D/O. LATE PUSHPARAJ, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS 11. KUM. RENUKA, D/O. LATE PUSHPARAJ AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS (ALL ARE R/AT NO.306/A, RAMAMURTHYNAGAR, LAKSHMI THEATER ROAD, BANGALORE-560016.) RFA.No.1591/2022 ----------------------- 3 12. SMT. MANGALA GOWRI, W/O. SRI. RANGANATHAN, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 9TH MAIN, KALYANANAGAR, MARUTHI LAYOUT, HENNUR CROSS ROAD, BANGALORE-560043. 13. SMT. RAJESHWARI, W/O. SRI.SUBRAMANI, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT NO.660, 10TH CROSS, 9TH MAIN, KALYANANAGAR, MARUTHI LAYOUT, HENNUR CROSS ROAD, BANGALORE-560043. 14. SMT. VIJAYA S W/O. SRI. RAVI KIRAN, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT NO.78/4, 2ND FLOOR, ST.THOMAS TOWN POST LINGARAJAPURAM, BANGALORE-560084. …Respondents (By Sriyuths. K.M.Subair, Arnav A. Bagalwadi and Praveen Kamath, Advocates for C/R1). This Regular First Appeal filed Under Section 96 R/W order 41 Rule of CPC against the Judgment and Decree dated 15.06.2022 passed in O.S.No.26615/2010 on the file of the LVII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru dismissing the suit for partition. RFA.No.1591/2022 ----------------------- 4 This Regular First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following: ORAL ORDER At request of learned counsel for the appellant, a week’s time is granted to rectify the office objections, failing which, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Bench. Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Court Order dated.04.08.2025 not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- [[[[[[[[[[[[[ ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By: BR R By: UN C By: STE