Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72420 (BOM)

BALKRISHNA BHIKU BHOSALE v. GOURI BALKRISHNA BHOSALE

IA/8931/2024 · 2025-12-15

Shri Ajit B Kadethankar, Shri M S Karnik

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

3-IA-1717-2024 (C).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST) NO. 35530 OF 2023 Balkrishna Bhiku Bhosale ...Petitioner Versus Gouri Balkrishna Bhosale ...Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1717 OF 2024 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST) NO. 35530 OF 2023 Balkrishna Bhiku Bhosale ...Applicant Versus Gouri Balkrishna Bhosale ...Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8931 OF 2024 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST) NO. 35530 OF 2023 Balkrishna Bhiku Bhosale ...Applicant Versus Gouri Balkrishna Bhosale ...Respondent ….. Adv. Vishal Khetre a/w Adv. S.C. Mangle. a/w for Applicant/Appellant. Adv. Sanman M. A. for the Respondent. ….. CORAM : M.S. KARNIK & AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, JJ. DATE : 15th DECEMBER, 2025. P.C: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The parties have iled consent terms, which are taken on record ZIP 1 of 2 3-IA-1717-2024 (C).doc and marked ‘X’ for identiication. 3. The applicant/appellant as well as the respondent is personally present in the court. They are identiied by their respective counsel. 4. The respondent- Ms.Gouri Balkrishna Bhosale says that she is satisied with the settlement and further submits that the same is voluntary without any pressure exerted on her. Parties, therefore, do not want to continue the appeal any further. 5. The consent terms dated 15th December 2025 are also signed by the respective parties. 6. The Family Court Appeal is disposed of in terms of the consent terms. 7. In view of disposal of the Family Court Appeal, both the interim applications also stand disposed of. [AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.] [M.S. KARNIK, J.] ZIP 2 of 2