Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7241 (UTT)

PREMA DASILA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/907/2025 · 2025-06-04

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 15 WPSS No.907 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. Heard. The defects are ignored. The petitioner claims the benefit of Inter-Region Transfer Policy from Garhwal Region to Kumaon Region. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner had already applied for inter-region transfer according to the Standard Operating Procedure, but her case has not been considered. The petitioner had already submitted a representation to the respondent no.3/The Director, Secondary Education, on 05.02.2025, but it has yet not been decided. Learned State Counsel would submit that the representation dated 05.02.2025, Annexure No. 9 to the writ petition, will be decided by the respondent no.3/The Director, Secondary Education, within a period of 4 weeks. The Court takes on record the statement given by learned State Counsel. The writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondent.3/The Director, Secondary Education, to decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of 4 weeks from today. [ (Ravindra Maithani J.) 04.06.2025 RV