IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68197 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-637 Year-2023 Thana- GAYA COMPLAINT CASE District- Gaya ====================================================== 1. Ritesh Ranjan S/o Chandrashekhar Prasad Singh R/o House No-D/5, Mohalla- Birla Colony, P.S.- Phulwari Shairf, Dist .- Patna 2. Chandrashekhar Prasad S/o of Sri Krishna Nand Singh R/o House No-D/5, Mohalla- Birla Colony, P.S.- Phulwari Shairf, Dist.- Patna 3. Leela Singh W/o Chandrashekhar Prasad Singh R/o House No-D/5, Mohalla- Birla Colony, P.S.- Phulwari Shairf, Dist.- Patna 4. Rohit Raj @ Rohit Kumar S/o Sri Chandrashekhar Prasad Singh R/o House No-D/5, Mohall- Birla Colony, P.S.- Phulwari Shairf, Dist .- Patna 5. Sapna Kumari W/o Rohit Raj @ Rohit Kumar R/o House No-D/5, Mohall- Birla Colony, P.S.- Phulwari Shairf, Dist .- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Archana Parmar D/o Sri Dinesh Singh House No- 84, MIG, Mohalla- Saheed Bhagat Singh Colony, Mustafabad, P.S.- Rampur, Dist .- Gaya ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nandlal Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate Mr. Rajeev Nayan, Advocate For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 08-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the O.P. No. 2 as well as learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the parties have stated that in pursuance to the settlement agreement, which has been brought on record by way of Annexure P2, the parties have compromised and even the decree for divorce has already been passed. It has further been stated that as per the terms of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68197 of 2024(2) dt.08-08-2025 2/2 compromise as stated in Para 9, the petitioners had to file quashing application arising out of Complaint Case No. 637 of 2023 ( present case). 3. Learned counsel for the O.P. No. 2 does not dispute the submissions made by the parties and has stated that in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties, all the conditions have been fulfilled and he does not have any objection to the disposal of the present application. 4. In view of the aforesaid submission and taking into account that the parties have compromised and therefore the order dated 20.01.2024 passed in Complaint Case No. 637 of 2023 arising out of learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Gaya is hereby allowed. 5. Accordingly, present application is stands allowed. Siwani/- (Sourendra Pandey, J) U T