Kuleshwar Yadav @ Kauleshwar Prasad v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./60849/2025 · 2025-09-18
Sunil Dutta Mishra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72399 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72399 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60849 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-205 Year-2025 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada ====================================================== Kuleshwar Yadav @ Kauleshwar Prasad, S/O Shyam Yadav @ Shyam Prasad resident of Village- Baudhi Khurd, P.S.- Rajauli, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Suruchi Anand, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Indu Kumari Srivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 18-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 205 of 2025 for the offences registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.
3. On getting secret information regarding transportation of illicit liquor on a motorcycle, police party reached at the marked place. It is alleged that petitioner fled away from the spot leaving the motorcycle and two plastic sacks. On search, total 213 litre country made liquor was recovered from the motorcycle and the alleged plastic sacks.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case being owner of the said motorcycle. Petitioner was not
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60849 of 2025(2) dt.18-09-2025 2/2 apprehended on the spot. Petitioner has no concern with the seized liquor. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. There is no independent witness to the seizure-list. Petitioner has clean antecedent. He is in custody since 28.07.2025. Petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the trial.
5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made on behalf of the parties, facts and circumstances of the case and period of custody, let the petitioner, named above, be enlarged on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Excise Court II, Nawada in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 205 of 2025.
rakhi (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J.) U T