G.JACKULIN ROSE v. The State Rep. by the Superintendent of Police
CRL OP/19305/2025 · 2025-07-10
P Velmurugan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72394 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72394 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.19305 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10.07.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.O.P.No.19305 of 2025 G.Jackulin Rose ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police Office of the Superintendent of Police Nagapattinam
2. The Superintendent of Police Office of the Superintendent of Police Thiruvarur
3. The Inspector of Police District Crime Branch Office Nagapattinam
4. The Inspector of Police District Crime Branch Office Thiruvarur ... Respondents
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to direct the respondents 2 and 4 to not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry which is purely a civil dispute, based on the representation of the petitioner dated 19.05.2025. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.19305 of 2025 For Petitioner
: Mr.A.Mohamed Ismail For Respondents : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) O R D E R The Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner to direct the respondents 2 and 4 to not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry, based on the representation of the petitioner dated
19.05.2025. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is a School Teacher and she had borrowed money from the defato complainant for construction of house and that the dispute is purely civil in nature, whereas, the police are unnecessarily interfering and threatening the petitioner. Hence, the present petition is filed. 3. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 4. It is seen that the petitioner a Government servant. The Government Servants should obtain prior permission from their department for borrowal of loan, whereas, the petitioner has not followed the due process of law. Therefore, she is not entitled to get the relief as sought for since she is not a law abiding citizen. 5. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.19305 of 2025
6. However, the respondents police are directed not to interfere with the money transactions of any of the parties. 10.07.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No ksa-2 To
1. The Superintendent of Police Office of the Superintendent of Police Nagapattinam
2. The Superintendent of Police Office of the Superintendent of Police Thiruvarur
3. The Inspector of Police District Crime Branch Office Nagapattinam
4. The Inspector of Police District Crime Branch Office Thiruvarur
5.
The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras, Chennai 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.19305 of 2025 P.VELMURUGAN, J ksa-2 Crl.O.P.No.19305 of 2025 10.07.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis