SANTOSH VASANT KHUNE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DEPT. OF ROAD AND DEVELOPMENT AND ORS
WP/2991/2020 · 2025-11-11
Shri Ajit B Kadethankar, Shri M S Karnik
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72391 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72391 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
906-2991-2020-CWP=.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2991 OF 2020 Santosh Vasant Khune … Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents …………. Mr. Shantanu C. Gurav a/w Mr. Dnyaneshwari S. Utpat i/b Mr. Sarang Aradhye (through VC) for the Petitioner. Mr. V.M. Mali, AGP for the Respondent - State. …………. Coram : M. S. Karnik & Ajit B. Kadethankar, JJ. Date : November 11, 2025.
P. C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The present petition seeks a direction to the respondent nos.2 to 5 to demolish illegal and unauthorized construction carried out by the respondent no.6 on Gat No. 566/6/A on State Highway 143 to Takli Kasegaon Anavali Ranzani Road, State Highway 83 and on right hand side of Pandharpur Mangalwedha Highway. Uday S. Jagtap 1 of
2 UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP Digitally signed by UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP Date: 2025.11.11 18:43:26 +0530
906-2991-2020-CWP=.doc
3. Our attention is invited to the communication dated 22nd October 2018 addressed to the petitioner informing him that the subject construction is made without the requisite permission of the Sub-Divisional Engineer, PWD Sub-Division, Pandharpur. It is submitted that the respondent no.4 is the competent authority to take action against the unauthorized structures.
4. Learned AGP appears for the respondent nos.1 to 4.
5. In view of the above, we direct the respondent no.4 to take appropriate action against the unauthorized construction in accordance with law.
6. Needless to mention that respondent no.4 shall issue notice to the respondent no.6 as well as the petitioner and upon hearing them, take appropriate action in accordance with law. This exercise be completed preferably within a period of 16 weeks from the date of communication of this order.
7. The Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. [Ajit B. Kadethankar, J. ] [ M. S. Karnik ] Uday S. Jagtap 2 of
2