Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7239 (CHH)

UTTAM SINGH CHANDRA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/953/2021 · 2025-07-01

Shri Sanjay Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 953 of 2021 Uttam Singh Chandra S/o Late Ramdeen Chandra, Aged About 54 Years Occupation- Advocate, At- Civil Court, Jaijaipur, District- Janjgir-Champa, C.G., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Law, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, C.G., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The District And Session Judge District- Janjgir-Champa, C.G., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Chhattisgarh State Bar Council, Bilaspur Through- Its Secretary, H.Q.- High Court Campus, Above Indian Coffee House, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, (C.G.), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Tehsil Adhiwakta Sangh Through- The Secretary, Jaijaipur, District- Janjgir-Champa, (C.G.), District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 5 - Shri Umashankar Shukla The President, Tehsil Adhiwakta Sangh, Jaijaipur, District- Janjgir-Champa, (C.G.), District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 6 - Shri Bharat Lal Chandra The Secretary, Tehsil Adhiwakta Sangh, Jaijaipur, District- Janjgir-Champa, (C.G.), District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : None. For Respondent No.1/State : Shri Ratan Pusty, Govt. Advocate. For Respondent No.3 : Shri Ajay Mishra, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Sachin Nidhi, Advocate. For Respondents No.4 & 6 : Shri Ajay Kumar Chandra, Advocate. For Respondent No.5 : None, though served. NARESH KUMAR KAMDE Digitally signed by NARESH KUMAR KAMDE Date: 2025.07.03 10:33:45 +0530 2 SB: Hon'ble Shri Justic e Sanjay S. Agrawal Order on Board 02/07/2025 1) No one appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner, even when the case is called in the second round of hearing. 2) In the above circumstances, in absence of any representation, this Court is left with no other option, but to dismiss this petition for non- prosecution. 3) Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/-Sd/- Sd/- d/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) JUDGE Kamde