MR. CHANDRASHEKHAR S/O. SANNA YANKOBA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.P/100689/2021 · 2025-03-14
Shivashankar Amarannavar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7238 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7238 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:4759 CRL.P No. 100689 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100689 OF 2021 BETWEEN:
1.
MR. CHANDRASHEKHAR S/O. SANNA YANKOBA AGE. 25 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT/AGRICULTURE, R/O. TONDIHAL VILLAGE, TQ. GANGAVATHI, DT. KOPPAL-583227.
2.
MR. YAMANAPPA S/O. DURGAPPA MULIMANI AGE. 35 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. TONDIHAL VILLAGE, TQ. GANGAVATHI, DT. KOPPAL-583227. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NEELENDRA D. GUNDE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY KARATAGI POLICE R/BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING-DHARWAD-580001.
2.
SARASWATHI BASAVARAJ BOGAPUR, AGE. 21 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT/HOUSEWIFE, R/O. TONDIHAL VILLAGE, TQ. GANGAVATHI, DT. KOPPAL-583227.
(AS STATED IN COMPLAINT) NOW WIFE OF PETITIONER NO.1 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAMESH B. CHIGARI, AGA FOR R1)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C.
PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 07.06.2016 PASSED BY DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-KOPPAL IN POCSO SC NO.13/2016 THEREBY TAKING COGNIZANCE FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S 376, 109 OF IPC AND SEC. 6, 11 AND 16 OF POCSO ACT-2012., IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER IS CONCERNED, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
Digitally signed by ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:4759 CRL.P No. 100689 of 2021
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for petitioners has filed a memo. Memo reads thus:
“The counsel for petitioners submitting that the above matter having became infructuous and main matter has been Disposed off. Hence, this memo.”
2. In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE
RKM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 3