Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7238 (JK)

SUHALE AHMAD KHAN v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (NATIONAL HYDROELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION)

WP(C)/1026/2025 · 2025-05-06

Sanjay Dhar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

84 Suppl HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) No. 1026/2025 CM No. 2689/2025 Suhale Ahmad Khan ….. Petitioner (s) Through: Mr. Danish Majeed, Adv. V/s Union Territory of J&K & Ors ….. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Irshad Ahmad, Adv. for R2 to 5 Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar, Judge ORDER 06.05.2025 1. The petitioner through the medium of present petition is seeking a direction upon the respondents to consider and decide the representation dated 06.08.2024 which he has submitted through his mother Mst. Sara Begum in connection with appointment of the petitioner against one of the two vacant slots bearing Serial No. 27 or 28 in the selection list issued vide Notification No. DCB/LA/NHPC URI-II/Employment/2015 dated 11.08.2015. 2. It has been submitted that due to the pendency of the litigation, the selection process in favour of the land losers/their dependents could not be taken to its logical conclusion and it is only on P a g e | 2 WP(C) No. 1026/2025 CM No. 2689/2025 04.07.2024, that this Court finally decided the issue and the respondents were given liberty to finalize the selection list and issue order of appointment in favour of the candidates shortlisted for the purpose. 3. The petitioner submits that he had made a representation before respondent No. 1/Deputy Commissioner, Baramulla, however, the said representation is not being decided. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner would feel satisfied if an appropriate direction is issued to respondent No.1/Deputy commissioner Baramulla to consider and decide the representation filed by the petitioner in accordance with law within a specified time. 4. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 1/Deputy Commissioner Baramulla to accord consideration to the representation submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law most expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is made available to the said respondent. 5. Disposed of. (Sanjay Dhar) Judge SRINAGAR 06.05.2025 Aasif