Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72367 (KAR)

SRI. SOMA v. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION

WP/25548/2024 · 2025-11-26

Jyoti M

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49022 WP No. 25548 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 25548 OF 2024 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN: SRI. SOMA, S/O. A.GOVINDAN, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO.1819/2, 9TH CROSS, ASHOKAPURAM, MYSORE - 570018. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VENKITARAMAN N.S., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, MYSURU URBAN DIVISION, MYSURU - 570001. …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49022 WP No. 25548 of 2024 ORAL ORDER When the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The petition is listed today for order regarding non-compliance with the office objections for the second time. A perusal of the daily order sheet reflects that, despite the grant of time, the office objections are not complied with. As already noted above, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution and for non- compliance with the office objections. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE KMV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15