Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72363 (BOM)

SMT. TARABAI BHAUSO MALI SINCE DIED THR LEGAL HEIRS v. KRUSHNAT PANDIT MALI AND ANR

WP/10113/2023 · 2025-12-11

Shri S G Chapalgaonkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

9-wp-10113-2023.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10113 OF 2023 Tarabai Bhauso Mali, Since Deceased Through LRs. …..Petitioners Vs. Krushnat Pandit Mali & Ors. …..Respondents Mr. Rugwed R. Kinkar, i/b. Mr. Drupad S. Patil, for the Petitioners. CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. DATED : 11th DECEMBER 2025 P.C.:- 1. The Petitioners/plaintiffs impugn order dated 6th July 2023 passed below Exhibit 115 in Special Civil Suit No.80 of 2011 pending before learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Kolhapur, whereby application filed by Petitioner for setting aside no cross order has been rejected. The Petitioners are plaintiffs in Special Civil Suit No.80 of 2011, which has been filed seeking cancellation of sale deed dated 17th January 2011. Plaintiff has already concluded evidence and suit is at stage of recording of evidence of defendants. 2. It appears that both parties have recklessly sought adjournments during pendency of suit. The conduct of Petitioners also cannot be countenanced. The trial Court recorded that on 11th Gaikwad RD 1/3 9-wp-10113-2023.doc April 2023, defendant’s cross-examination was closed. Thereafter, Petitioner filed an application dated 27th June 2023 to grant opportunity to cross-examine by setting aside no-cross order. In this background, trial Court rejected application. 3. It can be observed that suit is filed seeking cancellation of sale deed. The valuable rights of parties in respect of immovable property are subject matter of suit. If plaintiffs are not granted one more opportunity to cross-examine witness of defendant, they would suffer irreparable injury. The defendant can be compensated by granting reasonable costs. 4. In that view of matter, Writ Petition is partly allowed. 5. The impugned order dated 6th July 2023 passed below Exhibit 115 is set aside. Application Exhibit 115 is allowed, subject to condition that plaintiffs pay costs of Rs.5,000/- to defendants. The costs to be deposited in trial Court within a period of three weeks from today and be released to defendants. 6. Once the costs is deposited, plaintiffs shall be at liberty to cross-examine defendant’s witness on date as specified by trial Court Gaikwad RD 2/3 9-wp-10113-2023.doc without taking further adjournment. In case of failure to deposit costs, order dated 6th July 2023 passed by trial Court would govern the proceeding (S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.) Gaikwad RD 3/3 RAJU DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD Digitally signed by RAJU DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD Date: 2025.12.12 13:22:57 +0530