IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.127 Vaibhav Mittal Union of India and CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE M Present : Mr.Mukul Singla Mr.Vaibhav DEEPAK SIBAL, J 1. Challenge made through the in 20.06.2025 (Annexure P 148 of the Income Tax A petitioner is that the impugned notice has been Officer which could have not been 29.03.2022 (Annexure P the impugned notice could have been issued only by way of faceless assessment. 2. In support of his afore subm places reliance on the followin (i) CWP of India and others (ii) CWP and others 3. Learned counsel case of the petitioner is covered in aforesaid two judgments render IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mukul Singla, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr.Vaibhav Gupta, Standing Counsel for the * * * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Challenge made through the instant petition is to the notice (Annexure P-1) issued to the petitioner by the respondents of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The primary ground of at the impugned notice has been issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing ficer which could have not been done because in terms of the notification d Annexure P-2) issued by the Ministry of Finance, Go notice could have been issued only by way of faceless assessment. In support of his afore submission, learned counsel for the places reliance on the following two judgments of this Court: (i) CWP-15745-2024, titled Jatinder Singh Bhangu of India and others, decided on 19.07.2024; and (ii) CWP-21509-2023, titled Jasjit Singh vs. Union of India and others, decided on 29.07.2024. Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute the fact case of the petitioner is covered in his favour by the law laid down aforesaid two judgments rendered by two different co IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17914-2025 Date of decision : 03.07.2025 .…. Petitioner ..... Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL LAPITA BANERJI or the petitioner. for the Income Tax Department. stant petition is to the notice dated e petitioner by the respondents under Section ct, 1961. The primary ground of challenge raised by the issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing done because in terms of the notification dated issued by the Ministry of Finance, Government of India, notice could have been issued only by way of faceless assessment. ission, learned counsel for the petitioner g two judgments of this Court:- Jatinder Singh Bhangu vs. Union , decided on 19.07.2024; and Jasjit Singh vs. Union of India dents does not dispute the fact that the favour by the law laid down through the ed by two different co-ordinate Benches of this Court SHAMSHER SINGH 2025.07.07 18:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and haryana high court, chandigarh CWP-17914-2025 in the cases of Jatinder Singh Bhang 4. In the light of the above, in te Jatinder Singh Bhangu and Jasjit Singh (Annexure P-1), issued by the Jurisdictional liberty to the respondents to 5. The petition is allowed in the above terms. 03.07.2025 shamsher [ 2 ] Jatinder Singh Bhangu and Jasjit Singh In the light of the above, in terms of the law laid down in the Jatinder Singh Bhangu and Jasjit Singh (supra), the impugned ), issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer, i liberty to the respondents to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law. The petition is allowed in the above terms. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No Jasjit Singh (supra). rms of the law laid down in the cases of (supra), the impugned notice dated 20.06.2025 Assessing Officer, is hereby quashed with proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law. The petition is allowed in the above terms. [DEEPAK SIBAL] JUDGE [LAPITA BANERJI] JUDGE Yes / No Yes / No SHAMSHER SINGH 2025.07.07 18:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and haryana high court, chandigarh