MANOJ YADAV ALIAS BINAY YADAV ALIAS VINAY KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./1860/2025 · 2025-06-23
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7236 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7236 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:16543] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.1860 of 2025
------ Manoj Yadav @ Binay Yadav @ Vinay Kumar son of Sri Nakul Yadav aged about 25 years, resident of village Ichatu, P.O. Kunda, P.S. Kunda, District- Chatra, Jharkhand.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Baban Prasad, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Sudhir Kr. Mahto, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.03 Dated- 23-06-2025 I.A. No.5887 of 2025
Heard the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this interlocutory application has been filed with a prayer for early hearing of the instant bail application.
Since, the hearing of instant bail application is taken up today, hence, this interlocutory application stands disposed of being infructuous.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) B.A. No.1860 of 2025
The petitioner has been made accused in connection Manatu P.S. Case No.18 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. No.125 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Section 364A, 386, 387/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in abduction for ransom. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has not been put on Test Identification Parade nor is there any allegation of the petitioner being directly involved in commission of the offence. It is also submitted that the only allegation against the petitioner is that
the petitioner was present at the time of occurrence and worked in tandem with the co-accused person and he is said to be connected in the same thread. It is further submitted that charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 16.01.2025 as is evident from para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Palamau at Daltonganj in connection with Manatu P.S. Case No.18 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. No.125 of 2023 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/