Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72356 (ALL)

NIROTTAM SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/22418/2025 · 2025-08-04

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Prashant Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:132684-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 22418 of 2025 Petitioner :- Nirottam Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arun Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- Avinash Chandra Srivastava,C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State. 2. The instant writ petition has been preferred for a direction to respondents to provide the compensation of the acquired land, which was utilized by the respondents and for a further direction to respondents not to take over the land of petitioner without following the due procedure prescribed under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. 3. Per contra, learned Standing Counsel informed to the Court that for redressal of grievance of tenure holders, claiming certain right/title over their land, which is acquired, the State Government had issued detailed Government Order dated 12.05.2016, wherein, parties may put their claim and remedial forum is available at District Level Committee consisting of revenue officials. He submits that in case the matter be relegated to the District Level Committee, it may examine the claim set up by the petitioner and adequate compensation would be ensured, if any, as per The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and as such no interference is required by this Court, at this stage. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits of the issue involved, with the consent of parties herein, the writ petition stands disposed of with observation that in case the petitioner moves a fresh representation ventilating his grievance before the authority concerned constituted under the Government Order dated 12.05.2016 within two weeks, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks, thereafter. Order Date :- 5.8.2025 Ranjeet Sahu Digitally signed by :- RANJEET SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- RANJEET SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad