IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 114 CRM-M-6947-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.07.2025. Amandeep Singh @ Amandeep Singh Purewal ...Petitioner. Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents. *** CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR ....... Present: Mr. Shubham Chandel, Advocate for the petitioner. *** SUKHVINDER KAUR , J. Prayer in the instant petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of direction to respondent No.2 to provide protection of life and liberty to the petitioner and further directing respondents No.3 and 4 not to harass, humiliate and physically and mentally torture the petitioner by frequently calling them in the police station/ police post and made them sit in the police station for hours together with malafide intentions. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the petitioner is engaged in the business under the name and style of 'Guru Nanak Tyre' and has clean antecedents. On 18.06.2025 at around 12:00 P.M., respondent No.4 along with two unknown individuals, without serving any notice had forcibly taken the petitioner to the Police Station City Morinda, in a humiliating manner in the presence of his wife and other persons. The KOMAL 2025.07.02 17:58 I attest to the accuracy of this document CRM-M-6947-2025 (O&M) -2- petitioner was confined and illegally detained at the police station, where respondent No.3 insulted him and slapped him without any reason and in collusion with the other police officials and Local Municipal Councillor. The petitioner moved complaint dated 23.06.2025 before the Director General of Police, Punjab, however no action was taken. Thereafter, the petitioner also moved representation dated 24.06.2025 (Annexure P-2) before respondent No.2, but no action on the same has been taken till date. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he would be satisfied if the representation dated 24.06.2025 (Annexure P-2), which had already been moved by the petitioner is looked into. Notice of motion. Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice and submitted that she has no objection if the aforesaid representation dated 24.06.2025 (Annexure P-2) is looked into. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, District Rupnagar, Punjab, to look into the aforesaid representation and to take appropriate action, if any required at the earliest. Disposed of. (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 02.07.2025. Komal Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/ No Whether reportable? : Yes/ No KOMAL 2025.07.02 17:58 I attest to the accuracy of this document