Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72330 (KAR)

SMT PARVATHAMMA v. SRI RAGHU

WP/17011/2025 · 2025-08-18

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31973 WP No. 17011 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 17011 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT PARVATHAMMA W/O PUTTASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT NAGALAPURA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HOLENARASIPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573211. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJARAMA S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI RAGHU S/O LATE KRISHNEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT KEMPAKA NAGARA, JANATHA COLONY, SAKALESHAPURA TOWN-573134. 2. SMT. SHRUTHI W/O MOHAN KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT DODDAANKOD VILLAGE, SOMAVARAPETE TALUK, KODAGU DISTRICT-571236. 3. SMT. RATHNAMMA W/O LATE RAJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31973 WP No. 17011 of 2025 R/AT NAGALAPURA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HOLENARASIPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573211. 4. SRI. RAVI S/O LATE RAJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NAGALAPURA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HOLENARASIPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT- 573211. 5. SRI. RAJINIKATH S/O LATE RAJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/AT NAGALAPURA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HOLENARASIPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573211. 6. THE THASILDAR, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, HOLINARASIPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573211. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 16.02.2022 IN O.S NO. 143/2016 BEFORE THE COURT OF PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., AT HOLENARASIPURA. A COPY OF THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER IS PRODUCED HEREWITH AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31973 WP No. 17011 of 2025 ORAL ORDER The petitioner is before this Court calling in question the judgment and award dated 16.02.2022 in a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. But an appeal under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure ought to have been filed before the Appellate Court. 2. Reserving such liberty, the petition stands disposed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE SSD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 284