Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7233 (UTT)

MOHAMMD SAJID AND ANR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/543/2025 · 2025-06-09

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No.543 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. G.D. Joshi, Advocate for the petitioners. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. for the State. 3. By means of this writ petition, petitioners have impugned FIR No.0147 of 2025 dated 28.05.2025, under Sections 318(4) and 61(2) of B.N.S. 2023, registered with Police Station Banbhoolpura, District Nainital. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has limited his argument to the extent that the investigation agency should comply with the guidelines given in Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and another reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273. 5. Since offence under Sections 318(4) and 61(2) of B.N.S. 2023, carries a punishment upto seven years, therefore before resorting to any arrest, a prior notice under Section 35(3) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 (under Section 41-A of Cr.P.C.) is necessary to be issued to the petitioners. Hence, it is provided that before taking any coercive measures against the petitioners, the Investigating Officer shall abide by procedure given under Section 35(3) of the B.N.S.S. Act, 2023 (under Section 41-A of Cr.P.C.) 6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed-off. 7. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of accordingly. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 09.06.2025 SK