Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:111856 Court No. - 77 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 24181 of 2025 Applicant :- Rakesh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Virendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Present application has been preferred with prayer to direct the trial court to accept two sureties, which are being submitted by the applicant in respect of Case Crime no. 370/2015, under Section 2/3 of U.P.Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, PS- Kakod, District Bulandshahr in which applicant has been granted bail vide order dated 30.05.2025 and the same sureties bond be accepted in all 5 other cases relating to Case Crime nos. 315 of 2015, 307 of 2015, 313 of 2015, 308 of 2015 and 316 of 2015 in which applicant has already been released on bail vide orders dated 31.05.2025, 05.06.2025, 05.06.2025, 27.05.2025 & 05.06.2025. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for applicant sought the direction of this Court in shape of instructing the trial court to permit two sureties for all six cases wherein, applicant has already been enlarged on bail. 4. Per contra, learned AGA vehemently opposed the prayer sought through the instant application. 5. During the course of argument a precise query has been raised before learned counsel for applicant that whether applicant has ever preferred the bail bond in pursuance to the aforesaid cases wherein he has been enlarged on bail and if so, whether there is a specific denial from learned trial court in shape of asking separate sureties for separate cases. In response to the query, learned counsel for applicant fairly submitted that applicant never preferred any bail bond in pursuance to any of aforesaid cases in which he has been enlarged on bail and there is no specific denial from learned trial court concerned. 6. In view of aforementioned discussions and after perusing the records, this Court finds that no prejudice has been caused to the applicant as applicant never intended to prefer bail bonds in pursuance to first bail order dated 27.05.2025, although thereafter till 05.06.2025 applicant has already been extended bail in consecutive 6 cases but at no point of time he intended to prefer bail bonds and as such there is hardly any denial available in record with regard to two surety in each and ever bail bond. Hence, no cause of action arises in favour of applicant to pursue the instant application. Applicant is free to move application for seeking same relief as made in the instant application before learned concerned court. 7. The instant application stands disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 11.7.2025 Shaswat Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad