Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7230 (KAR)

MAHALINGAPPA S/O MALAPPA NIMBARGI, v. THE L.A.O. and AC

MFA/25521/2012 · 2025-07-21

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA MFA NO.25521/2012 (LAC) BETWEEN: MAHALINGAPPA S/O. MALAPPA NIMBARGI, AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: MAHALINGAPUR, TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT. …APPELLANT [BY SHRI S. S. PATIL, ADV.] AND: 1. THE L.A.O. & AC, JAMKHANDI, TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT. 2. THE ASST.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KEB, MAHALINGPUR, TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, JAMKHANDI, TQ: JAMKHANDI, DIST: BAGALKOT. …RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.54(1) OF LA ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:16-08-2012 LAC.NO.3111/1998 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MUDHOL, PARTLY ALLOWING THE REFERENCE PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENAHANCEMET OF COMPENSATION. : 2 : THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: - JUDGMENT Learned counsel again seeks time to pay DCF and remove the office objections. A final opportunity was granted on 13.02.2013 to pay the DCF and remove all the office objections before 20.02.2013. Despite the final opportunity granted, there is non-compliance in all aspects. In the circumstances, the appeal is rejected under Order VII Rule 11(c) of CPC. Sd/- JUDGE Rsh