Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:119143 Court No. - 69 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 5497 of 2025 Applicant :- Shakeel Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ruduvant Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J. 1. Copy of the CD-3 dated 17.05.2025 produced by learned AGA, is taken on record. 2. At the outset, Sri V.P.Tripathi, learned AGA submits that during the course of investigation Section 109 BNS has been deleted vide CD no.3 dated 17.05.2025 and investigation is pending against the applicant under Sections 352, 351(2) B.N.S. 3. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri V.P.Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record. 4. This application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 235 of 2025, under Sections 109, 352, 351(2) B.N.S., Police Station Nai Mandi, District Muzaffar Nagar. 5. Counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. In the alleged incident the informant has not received any injury. As per the medical report, no external injury was seen at the time of medical examination. At this stage, there is no credible evidence to link the applicant with the offence. Criminal history of the applicant has been explained in para 19 of the affidavit. The investigation under Sections 352, 351(2) B.N.S is going on and the applicant has apprehension of his arrest in the above mentioned case. 6. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 7. Having regard to the submissions made, considering the nature of accusations and antecedents of the applicant, in particular the fact that in the alleged incident the informant has not received any injury; as per the medical report, no external injury was seen at the time of medical examination; at this stage, there is no substantive evidence against the applicant, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail. 8. In the event of arrest, the applicant Shakeel involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on anticipatory bail during pendency of trial, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (i) The applicant shall co-operate with the Investigating Officer during investigation and shall report to the Investigating Officer as and when required for the purpose of conducting investigation; (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer; (iii) The applicant shall not leave the country during the currency of trial without prior permission from the concerned trial Court. (iv) The applicant shall surrender his passport, if any, to the concerned Court forthwith. His passport will remain in custody of the concerned Court. (v) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that they shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence and the witnesses are present in court. (vi) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. 9. In default of any of the conditions, the court concerned is at liberty to pass appropriate orders for enforcing and compelling the same. 10. The application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 22.7.2025 Lbm/- Digitally signed by :- LAL BAHADUR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad