Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7229 (UTT)

TULIKA CHANDRA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSB/193/2025 · 2025-06-05

Alok Mahra, G Narendar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 12.09.2025 MCC Review Application No. 1 of 2025 In WPSB No. 193 of 2025 Hon'ble G. Narendar, C.J. Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Shobhit Saharia, learned counsel for the petitioner-review applicant. 2. Mr. Gajendra Tripathi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 3. Dr. Kartikey Hari Gupta, learned counsel for respondent No. 3. 4. Present Review Application has been filed by the petitioner-review applicant seeking the following reliefs: “In the facts and circumstances explained above and in the interest of justice, it is humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to recall its order dated05.06.2025 to the extent that it refers to: i. Admission by the Counsel for the Petitioners that no Managing Committee exists for the College and that the District Magistrate is serving as the Administrator of the College. ii. Directions to the D.M. to instruct the Registrar of Societies to expedite the elections of the Managing Committee within the prescribed period.” 5. Today, learned counsel for the petitioner-review applicant would submit that in Paragraph-7 of the Judgment dated 05.06.2025, word “District Magistrate” be directed to be replaced by word “Chief Development Officer”. 6. The prayer being innocuous, and as the same is not being objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents, the same is allowed. Let the word “District Magistrate” be replaced by the word “Chief Developmkent Officer” in Paragraph-7 of the judgment dated 05.06.2025. 7. The Review Application stands disposed of accordingly. (Alok Mahra, J.) (G. Narendar, C.J.) 12.09.2025 12.09.2025 Rathour