Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72281 (BOM)

SANJAY RAMAKANT BAGALE AND ANR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND WATER CONSERVATIN DEPARTMENT

CP/633/2025 · 2025-12-24

Shri Ajit B Kadethankar, Shri M S Karnik

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

903 Cp-633-2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 633 OF 2025 Sanjay Ramakant Bagale and Others. ...Petitioners. Versus The State of Maharashtra and Others. ...Respondents. —————— Mr. Balaji Shinde (thr. V.C.) Mr. Abhay Jadhavar, Mr. Rutik Kashid for Petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Deokar and Mr. Vikas Mali for the Respondent-ZP. Mr. S. B. Kalel, AGP for the Respondent-State. —————— Coram : M. S. Karnik & Ajit B. Kadethankar, JJ. Date : December 24, 2025. P. C. : 1. Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioners. He submits that Petitioners have not been relieved. 2. Mr. Deokar, learned Counsel for Zilla Parishad, on instructions, fairly submits that Petitioners will be given fresh hearing and appropriate orders will be passed in terms of the order that is breached. In the meantime, the Petitioners have not been relieved, and shall not be relieved. 3. Petitioner’s status will be obviously governed by the observations made in the order that is breached in this contempt petition. 4. Contempt petition is disposed of. [Ajit B. Kadethankar, J.] [M. S. Karnik, J.] Patil-SR 1 of 1