IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Ishwar Singh Yadav State Information Commission Haryana and CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. issuance of a Mandamus upon respondent No.2, to supply complete information to the petitioner, under the R 2. nor anyone on his behalf is present. The record shows that even on earlier occasions, none had caused appearance on behalf of the petitioner. 3. matter. In such a situation, dismiss the 4. 13.08.202 Ak Sharma IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Ishwar Singh Yadav Versus State Information Commission Haryana and CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI None for the petitioner. Mr. Bhupender Singh, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Hanesh Kumar, Advocate, for Mr. G.S. Sullar, Advocate, for respondent No.3. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (Oral) The instant writ petition was filed in the year 2019, for issuance of a Mandamus upon respondent No.2, to supply complete information to the petitioner, under the Right to Information Act, 2005. The case has been called out twice, but neither the petitioner nor anyone on his behalf is present. The record shows that even on earlier occasions, none had caused appearance on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. In such a situation, this Court is left with no other option, but to dismiss the instant petition for non-prosecution. Dismissed for non-prosecution. .2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-22809-2019 Date of decision: 13.08.2025 ….Petitioner State Information Commission Haryana and another ….Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Bhupender Singh, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Hanesh Kumar, Advocate, for The instant writ petition was filed in the year 2019, for issuance of a Mandamus upon respondent No.2, to supply complete ight to Information Act, 2005. The case has been called out twice, but neither the petitioner nor anyone on his behalf is present. The record shows that even on earlier occasions, none had caused appearance on behalf of the petitioner. petitioner is not interested in pursuing the this Court is left with no other option, but to prosecution. prosecution. (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 5 The instant writ petition was filed in the year 2019, for issuance of a Mandamus upon respondent No.2, to supply complete The case has been called out twice, but neither the petitioner nor anyone on his behalf is present. The record shows that even on earlier petitioner is not interested in pursuing the this Court is left with no other option, but to