06.11.2025. 66 Ct.No.24. as WPA 22344 of 2025 Mrityunjoy Sardar & Anr. Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Sudarshan Ghosh. …for the Petitioner. 1. Mr. Ghosh appearing for the petitioner states that the respondent Bank has already taken possession of the premises concerned. 2. Thus, the writ petition has become infructuous. 3. The writ petition is, thus, dismissed. 4. There shall be no order as to costs. 5. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on usual undertaking. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)