LPA-870-2009 (O&M) 104 (1st case) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA M/s Larsen & T The Presiding Officer and another CORAM: HON HON Present:- Mr. Mr. Viranjeet Singh Mahal, Advocate and Ms. Suverna Mutneja, Advocate None for the respondents. SUDHIR SINGH None appears on behalf of the respondent At the outset, submits that during pendency between the appellant in receipt of the same amount of Rs.15 lakhs to of the same, he does not press the appeal further. 2. Disposed of accordingly, in view of 3. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. April 01, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: 2009 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Toubro Ltd. versus The Presiding Officer and another HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Mr. Pawan Kumar Mutneja, Senior Mr. Viranjeet Singh Mahal, Advocate and Ms. Suverna Mutneja, Advocate for the None for the respondents. ***** SUDHIR SINGH, J. (ORAL) None appears on behalf of the respondent At the outset, learned Senior counsel for the during pendency of the appeal, a compromise had already been effected between the appellant/Management and respondent No.2/Workman of the same; and in terms thereof, the amount of Rs.15 lakhs to respondent No.2/Workman. he does not press the appeal further. Disposed of accordingly, in view of Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) (SUKHVINDER KAUR Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No 1 of IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA-870-2009 (O&M) Date of decision: April 01, 2025 ….Appellant ….Respondent SUDHIR SINGH SUKHVINDER KAUR Pawan Kumar Mutneja, Senior Advocate with Mr. Viranjeet Singh Mahal, Advocate and for the appellant. None appears on behalf of the respondents. learned Senior counsel for the appellant/Management , a compromise had already been effected and respondent No.2/Workman, though he is not , the appellant/Management has paid an respondent No.2/Workman. He further submits that in view he does not press the appeal further. Disposed of accordingly, in view of aforesaid compromise. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE of 1 CHANDIGARH 2009 (O&M) , 2025 Appellant ….Respondents gement , a compromise had already been effected though he is not paid an He further submits that in view MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.04.04 10:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment