115 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6909-2025 Date of decision : 02.07.2025 Satnam Singh .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Karan Choudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) 1. Present petition has been filed seeking direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to decide the representation dated 25.06.2025 to safeguard the life and liberty of the petitioner and to take stern and legal action against the private respondents who are forcing and threatening to illegally take the possession of the house of the petitioner. Further prayer has been made to direct respondents No.4 to 7 not to indulge in any illegal activities or meddle in the peaceful life and liberty of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the redressal of his grievance, petitioner has filed a representation dated 25.06.2025 (Annexure P-1) before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Gurdaspur but the same has not been taken into consideration till date. He has further submitted that petitioner would be satisfied if representation dated 25.06.2025 (Annexure P-1) is decided in a time bound manner. He further submits that the affidavit appended in the petition though is POOJA SHARMA 2025.07.02 15:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-6909-2025 -2- of the petitioner, however, inadvertently in the head note of the affidavit name of the petitioner has been mentioned as Navjeevan Kumar instead of Satnam Singh and thus, prays that the same being a typographical error be rectified. 3. Notice of motion. 4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. J.S. Arora, D.A.G., Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents-State. 5. After hearing counsel for the parties, respondent No.2- the Senior Superintendent of Police, Gurdaspur is directed to decide the representation dated 25.06.2025 (Annexure P-1) filed by the petitioner expeditiously preferably within one month from today, in accordance with law. 6. In light of the further prayer made by counsel for the petitioner, name of the petitioner in the head note of the affidavit appended in the petition, be read as Satnam Singh instead of Navjeevan Kumar. 7. In view of the above, present petition is disposed of. ( RAJESH BHARDWAJ ) 02.07.2025 JUDGE ps-I Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No POOJA SHARMA 2025.07.02 15:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document