Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7223 (PAT)

Himanshu Kumar Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./76596/2025 · 2026-07-20

Sandeep Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76596 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2024 Thana- PANDAUL District- Madhubani ====================================================== Himanshu Kumar Chaudhary S/o- Sri Keshav Kishore Chaudahry R/o village - Gadhiya , P.s- Pandaul , District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Jevesh Kumar Chaudhary @ Chhotan S/o- Dharmendra Chaudhary R/v- Gadhiya Ps- Pandaul Dist- Madhubani 3. Naman Kumar Chaudhary S/o- Krishna Kumar Chaudhary R/v- Gadhiya Ps- Pandaul Dist- Madhubani ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ravi Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 20-07-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. 2. The present application has been filed seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to Opposite Party no. 2 vide order dated 19.08.2025 passed in A.B.P. No. 1511/2025 arising out of Pandaul P.S. Case No. 83 of 2024 registered under Sections 341, 342, 323, 452, 435, 436, 427/34 of the I.P.C. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the opposite parties and other co-accused persons are alleged of sprinkling petrol and setting the house on fire. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76596 of 2025(2) dt.20-07-2026 2/2 4. Considering the allegations levelled against the opposite parties, I am not inclined to cancel bail of opposite parties. 5. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed with liberty to the petitioner that if charge-sheet is submitted against accused persons, then the petitioner will have liberty to move the court below for cancellation of bail of opposite parties. 6. The defect(s) as pointed out by the Office, are hereby ignored. tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T