SRI NAGAPPA S/O. SANNAPPA SHIDENUR v. SMT SHARADA W/O. NAGAPPA SHIDENUR
RPFC/100165/2024 · 2025-01-06
E S Indiresh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7222 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7222 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:54 RPFC No. 100165 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 100165 OF 2024 (-) BETWEEN:
SRI. NAGAPPA S/O. SANNAPPA SHIDENUR ALIAS VADDAR, AGED 70 YEARS, OCC. EX. SERVICE MAN, R/O. SHIDENUR, TQ. BYADAGI, DIST. HAVERI-581106. …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S. G. KADADAKATTI AND SRI. AMIT ANANDHOLLI ADVOCATES)
AND:
SMT. SHARADA W/O. NAGAPPA SHIDENUR, ALIAS VADDAR, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. LAXMI NAGAR, DHARWAD-580001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SHIVASAI M PATIL, ADVOCATE)
-------
THIS RPFC FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT, 1984, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 23.08.2024 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, DHARWAD IN CRL.MISC.NO.235/2021 BY ALLOWING THIS REVISION PETITION IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
Digitally signed by MANJANNA E Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:54 RPFC No. 100165 of 2024
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH)
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. This petition is filed by the respondent challenging the order dated 23.08.2024 in Criminal Misc.No.235/2021 on the file of the Principal Judge, Family Court, Dharwad. 3. It is the case of the claimant/petitioner before the Family Court that the respondent herein is the legally wedded wife of the petitioner herein and their marriage was solemnized on 16.06.1978. It is further stated in the petition that, the respondent herein has filed Crl.Misc.No.60/2008 before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Ranebennur and said petition came to be compromised. It is also to be noted from paragraph 9 of the impugned order that the matrimonial proceedings have been filed by each other including the dispute of dissolution of their marriage. 4. Taking into consideration that the marriage is not disputed and the petitioner herein is a retired Ex-serviceman
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:54 RPFC No. 100165 of 2024
and therefore, granting of maintenance @ ₹8,000/- per month by the Family Court is just and proper, which does not call for any interference in this petition taking into consideration that the respondent herein is residing separately from the petitioner at Dharwad. Hence, the petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
YAN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 14