2025:HHC:28645 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CMPMO No. 61 of 2025 Decided on : 25.08.2025 Sh. Rahul Chugh. …Petitioner Versus Smt. Madhvi Singh Chauhan. …Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Ashok K. Tyagi, Advocate, for the respondent. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the light of the fact that the petitioner had been wrongly pursuing this remedy, the petitioner be allowed to withdraw this petition, with liberty to approach the appropriate Fora and it be observed that the period that has been spent by the petitioner while pursuing this remedy, be considered for the purpose of computing the limitation. 2. The petition is allowed to be withdrawn, with liberty 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:28645 as prayed for. It is observed that the time that has been spent by the petitioner while pursing this remedy, be taken into consideration while calculating limitation. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 25, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)