M/S DURGA CARRIERS PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA
WPC/421/2019 · 2025-01-22
Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7222 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7222 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:3956
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 421 of 2019 • M/s Durga Carriers Private Limited Through Arun Sharma Handling Supervisor, Bilaspur Branch M/s Durga Carriers Private Limited, R/o B D Complex Behind Vishal Traders Tifra Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner Versus
1. Union Of India Through General Manager, South East Central Railway, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
2. Chief Commercial Manager South East Central Railway, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
3. Senior Divisional Commercial Manager South East Central Railway, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. A.V. Shridhar, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Rishabh Deo Singh, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 22/01/2025
1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):-
“10.A That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a appropriate writ/order/direction thereby directing the respondents to produce the entire records before the Hon’ble Court. 10.B That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/order/direction directing the respondents to refund the amount of Rs.401520/- with an interest of 18% p.a. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI
2 10.C That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to decide the pending representation of the petitioner dated 30.01.2019 (Annexure A/3). 10.D That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to pay the cost of litigation to the petitioner. 10.E Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper may be passed.”
2. Mr. A.V. Shridhar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner pleads no instruction.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge vatti