125 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA THANA SINGH AND ORS GURPARTAP SINGH AND ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Tarun Singla, Mr. Eklavya Darshi, DAG, Punjab Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3. HARKESH MANUJA By way of present petition filed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with of India, prayer has been made for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents on account of alleged willful non order dated 04.04.2024 passed by this Court in CWP whereby a direction necessary action for shifting of the Hadda Rori already passed by it Rejoinder to the reply filed by respondent No.3, i.e. Gram Panchayat Village Kotra, Korianwal, Tehsil Phul, taken on record. Copy supplied. Learned counsel for the respondents informs that those resolutions were set aside by learned Director, Rural Development and Panchayat Department in exercise of powers under Section 199 of the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 vide its order dated 29.11.2024. It has also been informed that the said order is already under challenge before the Writ Court. In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition and the same is thus, disposed of. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: THANA SINGH AND ORS Versus GURPARTAP SINGH AND ORS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Tarun Singla, Advocate for the Mr. Eklavya Darshi, DAG, Punjab Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) By way of present petition filed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of of India, prayer has been made for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents on account of alleged willful non order dated 04.04.2024 passed by this Court in CWP whereby a direction was issued to Gram Panchayat to take further necessary action for shifting of the Hadda Rori already passed by it. Rejoinder to the reply filed by respondent No.3, i.e. Gram Panchayat Village Kotra, Korianwal, Tehsil Phul, taken on record. Copy supplied. Learned counsel for the respondents informs that those resolutions were set aside by learned Director, Rural Development and Panchayat Department in exercise of powers under Section 199 of the Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 vide its order dated 29.11.2024. It has also been informed that the said order is already under challenge before the Writ Court. In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition and the same is thus, disposed of. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-2571-2024 Date of Decision: May 06, 2025 ........Petitioners ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, DAG, Punjab Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3. By way of present petition filed under Section 12 of the Article 215 of the Constitution of India, prayer has been made for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents on account of alleged willful non-compliance of order dated 04.04.2024 passed by this Court in CWP-25991-2022 Gram Panchayat to take further necessary action for shifting of the Hadda Rori in view of the resolution Rejoinder to the reply filed by respondent No.3, i.e. Gram Panchayat Village Kotra, Korianwal, Tehsil Phul, District Bathinda is Learned counsel for the respondents informs that those resolutions were set aside by learned Director, Rural Development and Panchayat Department in exercise of powers under Section 199 of the Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 vide its order dated 29.11.2024. It has also been informed that the said order is already under challenge In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition 2024 May 06, 2025 By way of present petition filed under Section 12 of the Constitution of India, prayer has been made for initiation of contempt proceedings compliance of 2022 Gram Panchayat to take further in view of the resolution Rejoinder to the reply filed by respondent No.3, i.e. Gram Bathinda is Learned counsel for the respondents informs that those resolutions were set aside by learned Director, Rural Development and Panchayat Department in exercise of powers under Section 199 of the Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 vide its order dated 29.11.2024. It has also been informed that the said order is already under challenge In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.05.08 09:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-2571-2024 -2- Rule discharged. However, the petitioners shall be at liberty to seek revival of the present petition subject to outcome of the writ petition wherein the order dated 29.11.2024 has been impugned. 06.05.2025 (HARKESH MANUJA) Tejwinder JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.05.08 09:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document