Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72218 (KAR)

SRI SYED MOULANA v. K ARUNDATHI

CCC/929/2024 · 2025-09-04

Anu Sivaraman, Rajesh Rai K

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 04TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CCC NO.929/2024 BETWEEN: 1 . SRI SYED MOULANA SON OF LATE SYED KHALEEL SHAH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, RESIDING AT LAKKUR VILLAGE, NELAMANGALA TALUK,-560 102, BANGALURU DISTRICT. …COMPLAINANT/S (BY SRI./SMT : FAYAZ SAB B. G., ADVOCATE) AND 1 . K ARUNDATHI AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, THE TAHASILDAR, NELAMANGALA TALUK, NELAMANGALA-560 101, BENGALURU DISTRICT. 2 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. …ACCUSED CCC.NO.929/2024 2 THE CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 & 12 CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN HE PRAYS THAT THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT BE PLEASED TO ISSUE SUMMONS, TO THE ACCUSED NO.1 AND TO DEAL WITH HIM IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW FOR WILLFULLY AND DELIBERATELY NOT COMPLYING WITH THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT ON 05.12.2023 PASSED IN W.P.NO.25390/2022 (KLR- RR-SUR), WHEREIN DIRECTED THE ACCUSED NO.1/ RESPONDENT NO.4 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 24.11.2021, 11.01.2022 & 04.03.2022 IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW TO DELETE THE ENTRIES MADE IN THE RTC EXTRACTS, IF THE PROCEEDINGS ARE ALREADY CONCLUDED WHICH IS MENTIONED AT COLOUM NO.11 OF THE RTC EXTRACT, WITHIN SIX MONTHS FROM THE RECEIPT OF THE ORDER, WHICH AMOUNTS TO AN OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 11 & 12 OF THE CONTEMPT ACT, WHICH IS PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-N, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS CCC IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS ON THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER. CORAM: HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CCC.NO.929/2024 3 ORAL ORDER (PER: HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) No appearance for the complainant. Finally, a week’s time is granted for compliance of office objections, failing which, petition shall stand dismissed without reference to the Bench. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE TYPED BY : SK CASE WORKER : SMV COMPARED BY : SMV COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR