Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:112440 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9425 of 2025 Petitioner :- Devishankar Pandey And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Avnish Kumar Shukla,Mahesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. 1.Heard Sri Avnish Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri B.M.Shukla, learned Standing Counsel. 2. Petitioners are retired employees. 3. Admittedly, petitioners have not filed any representation before their respective retirement for payment of time pay scale and now they have approached this Court on ground that similarly situated employee has been given said benefit, though in support of such averment, no documentary proof is placed along with this writ petition. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that representation of one of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 15.2.2024 on ground that no similarly situated person was granted said benefit. 5. Order dated 15.2.2024 admittedly is not under challenge. 6. In the aforesaid circumstances, since not only the order dated 15.2.2024 is challenged as well as no documentary proof to support an averment that similarly situated employee has been granted the aforesaid benefit is filed, therefore, relief sought by the petitioners cannot be granted. However, petitioners are at liberty to approach the concerned respondents along with relevant documents, if any, in support of their submission. 7. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Order Date :- 14.7.2025 SB Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad