IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62802 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2025 Thana- Jagdishpur District- West Champaran ====================================================== Sonu Mahto @ Kuldeep Mandal son of Bhoj Mahto Resident of Village- Nakti Paterwa, Ward No. 10, Ps- Jagdispur, Dist- West champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kundan Rathore Alias Kundan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rana Randhir Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 17-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 110/2025 dated 23.06.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 190, 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 118, 109(1), 303(2), 352 of the BNS. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons are alleged to have stopped the vehicle of the informant and started abusing him. When the informant protested, the accused persons along with the petitioner stabbed the informant on his head and neck with Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62802 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 2/3 knife with an intention to kill causing severe injuries and they also assaulted with Lathi. When Chandan Kumar came to rescue, all the accused persons also assaulted him and the co-accused (Mantu Mahto) snatched his golden ring and the co-accused (Prabhu Mahto) snatched informant’s mobile phone, thereafter they fled away from there. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. As per the injury report, all the four injuries are stated to be simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 12.07.2025. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62802 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 3/3 satisfaction of learned Court concerned, West Champaran, Bettiah in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 110/2025. 7. The application stands allowed. guddukr/- (Chandra Prakash Singh, J) U T