Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72184 (PNJ)

SUMAN MASIH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/33755/2025 · 2025-07-02

H S Grewal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-33755-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 130 CRM-M-33755-2025 Date of Decision: 02.07.2025 SUMAN MASIH . ..PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Amarjeet Singh Prajapati, Advocate for the petitioner. **** H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing of order dated 02.06.2025 (Annexure P-4) passed by the learned Judge, Special Court, Gurdaspur vide which the bail order of the petitioner was cancelled and his bail bonds and surety bonds were forfeited to the State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail as he was named by the co-accused from whom 12 gm and 50 mg heroin was recovered. He further submits that during trial, the petitioner could not appear before the learned the trial Court on 02.06.2025 as he was unaware of the date fixed. As such the learned trial Court cancelled the bail orders of the petitioner and his bail bonds and surety bonds were ordered to be forfeited. Non-bailable warrants of arrest against the petitioner have been issued vide order dated 02.08.2025. He further contends that the petitioner may be Renu Rawat 2025.07.03 15:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-33755-2025 2 permitted to surrender before the learned trial Court to attend the trial proceedings regularly and, therefore, requests that the impugned order may be set aside. 3. Notice of motion. 4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Kamalpreet Bawa, DAG, Punjab. accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the case file. 6. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and limited prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner, this Court does not find any legitimate ground to interfere in the impugned order dated 02.06.2025 (Annexure P-4) passed by the learned Judge, Special Court, Gurdaspur. However, in case the petitioner surrenders before the trial Court within 03 days from today and appears at 10:00 A.M, on his doing so, the trial Court shall consider and decide the same on the same very day. 7. Petition stands disposed of. (H.S.GREWAL) 02.07.2025 JUDGE renu Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No Renu Rawat 2025.07.03 15:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document