. ,I. + IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMAR THURSDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUA ll^/O THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: [3327] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY` i:;`'_tc-_;xp CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1530 OF 2025 Betwee n : Sri Dudi RahuI Sai @ Sai, S/o. Srinivas, Aged 26 years, Resident of D.No.2-25-9, Kethavan Street, A.C. Gardens, Rajahmundry. Petitioner/Accused No.4 State ofAndhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Station House Officer, II Town L & O Police Station, Rajahmundry. AND Respondent/ComplaI-nant Petition under section 480 & 483 of BNSS, 2023 is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner/Accused No.4 on Bail in Crl-me No. 02 of 2025 of ll Town Police Statl'on, Rajamahendravaram. The petition/Appeal¢coming on for hearing, upon perusl'ng the petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M R K CHAKRAVARTHY Advocate for the petl'tioner, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) for the Respondent and the court made the following. ORDER: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIIVl[NAL PETITION NO.1530 OF 2025 This Criminal Petition, under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the petitioner/A4, seeking regular bail, in Crime No.2/2025 of Rajahmundry lI Town Police Station, East Godavari District. 2. A case has been registered against the petitioner and others for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2),118(1),109(1), 351(2), 79, 126(2) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1 )(s) & 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Casts and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. 3. Case of the prosecution in brief, is that on o5.01.2025 at about 6.40 p.m., when the husband of the de racfo complainant and his friend started from the house by car, Al to A4 and A6 kept their car as a hurdle for Passage for the reason that When A.1 was in jail in ganja case and requested the husband of the de facfo complainant to file a case, he made A.1 to stay more number of days in jail without filing the case. Al dragged the husband of the de favcfo complainant from the car; A1 & A3 to A5 caught hold of him; and A2 beat him with beer bottle on forehead with an intention to kill him, beat him with hands and kicked with legs, resulting which he sustained bleeding injuries and started running towards his house. Then, A1 catgrfr, . `. I_ 2 to A5 followed him and Al uttered at the house of the I-njured that he would kill him. When the de facto complaI-nant and her mother-in-law came to rescue, the accused beat them also and abused by touchl-ng their caste and threatened wl.th dire consequences. when the nejghbours gathered, they escaped from the scene. police arrested AI and A4 and got them remanded to judicial custody on o7.01.2025 and sI-nee then they are in judicl-al custody. 4. Heard. Perused the record. 5. Learned Assistant public Prosecutor submI'tS that major part of the investigation I-S completed and charge sheet could not be filed for want of inventory. 6. A perusal of the material available on record goes to showthatall the allegations are dI'reCted agaI'nSt A1, whereas the petitioner herein/A.4 and others are alleged to have caught hold of the c/e faofo complainant and A2 is alleged to have beaten the de facto complaI-nant wl'th beer bottle on the forehead with an I'ntentiOn tO ki" hl'm. The accusatI-On against the petI'tiOner herein l's to the extent of obstructing the passage and holding the de racfo complainant. The petitl'oner/A.4 has been languighsing in J®a" Sl®nCe 07.01.2025. 7. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petl'tioner/A4 herein, on the following condI'tl-OnS. {.`- T`.. $2xp I --- hIILi 3 (i) The petitioner/A4 herein shall be released on his executing a Personal bond for Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge for Trial of Cases under S.Cs. & S.Ts. (POA) Act-cum-X Additional District Judge, East Godavari District at Rajamahendravaram ; (ii) On release, the petitioner shall appear before the station House Officer concerned once in a week i.e. on every sunday between 10.00 a.m. and 05.00 p.m., till filing of charge sheet. 8. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. sD/-M.SRINIVAS ASSISTANT R I §FT FtAR ForA //TRUE COPY// sEC"ON `OFFICER _ _* \| \ ) a/,.v/ To, 1. The Special Judge for Trail of the cases under sc & sT (POA) Act - Gum -Addl'tional District Judge, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District. 2. The Superintendent, central Jail, Rajamahendravaram . 3. The Station House Officer, II Town Police Station, Rajamahendravaram. {` 4. One CC to SRI. M R K CHAKRAVARTHY Advocate [opuc] 5. Two cos t6 publl'c prosecutor (AP) High Court ofA.P., Amaravati [OUT]. 6. One spare copy Jr, . T \I HIGH COURT SRK,J DATED :20/02/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.1530 of 2025 ALLOWED €\'=T1,4 2% EE& \\\t t.rrt* Slr. *1, 'SREse£## __n*-` _ fur-.--¥+-