Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72178 (KAR)

SRI THIMMA SHETTY v. C SATHYABHAMA

CCC/1192/2024 · 2025-08-13

Anu Sivaraman, Rajesh Rai K

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31792-DB CCC No. 1192 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1192 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI. THIMMA SHETTY S/O LATE THIRUMALA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS RESIDING AT MADAGHATTA VILLAGE BIKKODU HOBLI, BELUR TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT-573 201 …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. BYRE GOWDA N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. C. SATHYABHAMA THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HASSAN DISTRICT HASSAN-573 201 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE ROOM No.505, 5TH FLOOR GATE-3, M.S. BUILDING DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001 REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY …ACCUSED (BY SMT. MAMATHA SHETTY, AGA) Digitally signed by CHANNEGOWDA PREMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31792-DB CCC No. 1192 of 2024 THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT, 1971, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN PRAYS THAT THE HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO PUNISH THE ACCUSED FOR THE WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER DATED 30.03.2023 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP No.6970/2017. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K) This Contempt of Court Case is initiated against the disobedience of the order dated 30.03.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.6970/2017 whereby it was directed to the Deputy Commissioner to consider the petitioner's application in Form No.53 submitted on 17.12.1998 i.e., in Annexure-B to the writ petition, as per the procedure prescribed under 1966 Rules and to pass appropriate order in accordance with law. 2. Learned Additional Government Advocate has filed the compliance affidavit dated 12.03.2025 along with the endorsement. We have perused the endorsement. The same depicts that based on the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner, an endorsement was issued by the Tahasildar. In such circumstance, this Contempt of Court Case does not survive for further consideration. Accordingly, the Contempt of - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31792-DB CCC No. 1192 of 2024 Court Case is dropped. The complainant is at liberty if aggrieved by the endorsements and all the contentions are left open. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE RAK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 55