MOHD. AMIR AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
WRIA/9444/2025 · 2025-07-13
Manju Rani Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72105 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72105 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:112627 Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9444 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mohd. Amir And 2 Others Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Jagdish Singh Bundela,Mohammad Zakir Counsel for Respondent :- Archana Singh,C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State, Ms. Archana Singh, learned counsel for respondent no. 2, Sri Gaurav Bisen, learned counsel for respondent no. 3 and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to implead District Basic Education Officer, Hathras as respondent no. 3 in the array of parties, during course of the day. The petitioners, who are Assistant Teachers in Primary Schools run by the Basic Shiksha Parishad, have preferred present writ petition for a direction upon respondent no. 2 - Secretary, Basic Shiksha Paishad, Prayagraj to make payment of two months' salary as they have worked as Haz Sewaks during their respective tenures, treating it as duty, in light of relevant circulars issued by CEO, Haz Committee of India, Ministry of Minority Affairs, and Joint Secretary, Minority Welfare, U.P. Lucknow.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for ventilation of their grievances, the petitioners have approached the authority concerned by moving representations. However, despite several representations moved by the petitioners, no heed has yet been paid.
Learned counsel for the State-respondents submits that in case petitioners move fresh applications/representations before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioners, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioners may make fresh applications/ representations, ventilating all their grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.2 within two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.2 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment.
Order Date :- 14.7.2025 DS Digitally signed by :- DIGAMBER SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- DIGAMBER SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad