Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-17052 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Ramesh Kumar
State of Haryana and others
CORAM:
Present:
KULDEEP TIWARI
1)
Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeks quashing of the order dated 24.08.2025 (Annexure P on account of treatment of his father, has been rejected by respondent No.3. 2)
income of the father of the petitioner is less than 3,000/ respondent No.3, failed to consider the abovesaid crucial aspect of the matter, while passing the thereby rejecting the genuine claim of the petitioner. 3)
4)
Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1, and Ms. Madhu Dayal, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of res 5)
the parties, and has also gone through the record. 6)
that the claim of the petitioner has been rejected by pass speaking order, as no reason, income of the father of the petitioner 17052-2026 (O&M) -1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Ramesh Kumar Versus
State of Haryana and others
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI
Mr. Praveen Moudgil, Advocate, for the petitioner.
**** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (Oral) The petitioner, by filing the instant writ petition Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeks quashing of the order dated 24.08.2025 (Annexure P-4), vide which, claim of medical reimbursement on account of treatment of his father, has been rejected by respondent
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that monthly income of the father of the petitioner is less than 3,000/ respondent No.3, failed to consider the abovesaid crucial aspect of the matter, while passing the impugned order in most thereby rejecting the genuine claim of the petitioner. Notice of motion. Mr. Bhupender Singh, learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1, and Ms. Madhu Dayal, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of res This Court has heard the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, and has also gone through the record. Upon a bare perusal of the impugned order, what emerges is that the claim of the petitioner has been rejected by pass speaking order, as no reason, whatsoever income of the father of the petitioner. 1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17052-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.05.2026 ….Petitioner
….Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Praveen Moudgil, Advocate, The petitioner, by filing the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeks quashing of the order dated 4), vide which, claim of medical reimbursement on account of treatment of his father, has been rejected by respondent e petitioner submits that monthly income of the father of the petitioner is less than 3,000/-. However, respondent No.3, failed to consider the abovesaid crucial aspect of the impugned order in most perfunctory manner, thereby rejecting the genuine claim of the petitioner. Mr. Bhupender Singh, learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1, and Ms. Madhu Dayal, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.2 and 3. This Court has heard the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, and has also gone through the record. Upon a bare perusal of the impugned order, what emerges is that the claim of the petitioner has been rejected by passing a totally non- whatsoever, has been assigned, except the . So much so, respondent No.3,
27.05.2026
under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeks quashing of the order dated 4), vide which, claim of medical reimbursement on account of treatment of his father, has been rejected by respondent e petitioner submits that monthly . However, respondent No.3, failed to consider the abovesaid crucial aspect of the manner, Mr. Bhupender Singh, learned Additional Advocate General, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1, and Ms.
Madhu This Court has heard the submissions advanced on behalf of Upon a bare perusal of the impugned order, what emerges is - , except the respondent No.3, AMIT KUMAR 2026.05.29 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CWP-17052 apparently, exact income of the fathe him. In this view of the matter, this Court has no occasion to refrain itself from observing that the same is 7)
learned District and Sessions Judge, Jind direction speaking order, as expeditiously as possible, the exact monthly income of Needless to assert that be afforded 8)
27.05.2026 Ak Sharma
17052-2026 (O&M) -2 apparently, failed to comprehend the significance of evaluation of the exact income of the father of the petitioner, who is solely dependent upon In this view of the matter, this Court has no occasion to refrain itself from observing that the impugned order is unsustainable, and the same is set aside. As a sequel to the above, the mat District and Sessions Judge, Jind to decide the claim of the petitioner afresh, speaking order, as expeditiously as possible, the exact monthly income of his father, Needless to assert that, before passing a fresh order, the petitioner shall afforded a due opportunity of hearing to substantiate his claim.
Disposed of, accordingly.
.2026
Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2-
failed to comprehend the significance of evaluation of the r of the petitioner, who is solely dependent upon In this view of the matter, this Court has no occasion to refrain impugned order is unsustainable, and thus, , the matter is remitted to the District and Sessions Judge, Jind-respondent No.3, with a to decide the claim of the petitioner afresh, by passing a speaking order, as expeditiously as possible, but only after working out father, which has a decisive bearing. before passing a fresh order, the petitioner shall due opportunity of hearing to substantiate his claim.
(KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE
Yes/No Yes/No failed to comprehend the significance of evaluation of the r of the petitioner, who is solely dependent upon In this view of the matter, this Court has no occasion to refrain thus, the with a by passing a after working out which has a decisive bearing. before passing a fresh order, the petitioner shall AMIT KUMAR 2026.05.29 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document