Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72083 (KAR)

SHIVA KARTHIK. N v. P. SANJANA

WP/22919/2023 · 2025-07-23

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28077 WP No. 22919 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 22919 OF 2023 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: 1. SHIVA KARTHIK N., S/O. NATARAJAN N., AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/AT NO. 54-8/2, 3RD CROSS, A. N. GUPTA LAYOUT, LAKKASANDRA, BANGALORE-560 030 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAGARAJA C., ADVOCATE) (ABSENT) AND: 1. P. SANJANA W/O. SHIVA KARTHIK, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT NO. 376, SKANDA, 3RD MAIN ROAD, 7TH CROSS, CHENNAMMANAKERE ACHUKATTU, BANASHANKARI III STAGE, BANGALORE-560 085. …RESPONDENT THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 05.09.2023 PASSED IN MC NO.4927/2022 ON IA NO.3 BEING FILED BY THE RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 24 OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT THEREBY AWARDING THE MONTHLY MAINTENANCE OF RS.15,000/-. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28077 WP No. 22919 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER The present writ petition is filed questioning the order dated 05.09.2023 passed on I.A. No.3 in M.C. No. 4927/2022, whereby the Court had granted monthly maintenance of an amount of Rs.15,000/-. 2. This petition is filed in the year 2023. From 2023, the same is pending for compliance of the office objections. There are as many as 15 objections raised by the office. Till today, neither the office objections are cleared, nor there was a representation before the Court. 3. This matter came up before the Court on 22.7.2025. On that day, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'dismissal' for today. 4. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28077 WP No. 22919 of 2023 5. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE KA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27