INNOVITI PAYMENT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED v. PINE LABS PRIVATE LIMITED
OS/2/2019 · 2025-07-23
Jyoti Mulimani
Review Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72063 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72063 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27820 OS No. 2 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 2 OF 2019 BETWEEN:
INNOVITI PAYMENT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 2ND & 3RD FLOOR,
"NGR THE EDGE" NO.41, SHIRDI ROAD, 3RD MAIN, 5TH CROSS, SHIRDI SAI BABA MANDIR ROAD, CAMBRIDGE LAYOUT, HALASURU, BENGALURU-560 008. KARNATAKA, INDIA, THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, MR.RAJEEV AGRAWAL. …PLAINTIFF (BY SRI. SATYAM RATHORE., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SAURABH ANAND., ADVOCATE)
AND:
PINE LABS PRIVATE LIMITED H.M.TOWERS, NO.58, 2ND FLOOR, BRIGADE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. KARNATAKA. THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY. …DEFENDANT (BY SRI. MANEESHA KONGOVI., ADVOCATE)
THIS ORIGINAL SUIT IS FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 1 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, READ WITH SECTION 104 OF THE PATENTS ACT, 1970. Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27820 OS No. 2 of 2019
THIS ORIGINAL SUIT IS LISTED FOR HEARING- INTERLOCUTARY APPLICATION, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER Sri.Satyam Rathore., counsel on behalf of Sri.Saurabh Anand., for the plaintiff and Smt.Maneesha Kongovi., counsel for the defendant have appeared in person. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that the plaintiff is withdrawing the suit. Counsel, therefore, submits that the oral submission may be placed on record and the suit may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the plaintiff submits that a conscious decision is taken by advocate on record and the plaintiff to withdraw the suit and if an order is passed, they shall not file a review petition or seek recalling or modification of the order. The oral submission made by counsel for the plaintiff is placed on record. The suit is dismissed as withdrawn. - 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27820 OS No. 2 of 2019
Counsel for the respective parties jointly submits that there is already an order of revocation by the Assistant Controller. Hence, the counter claim filed by the defendant does not survive for consideration as of today. The oral submission made by counsel for the respective parties is placed on record. The counter claim is dismissed. Because of dismissal of the suit, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory application if any are disposed of.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP/KMV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10