Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72057 (PNJ)

SUMANPREET KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/6851/2025 · 2025-07-08

N S Shekhawat

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

118 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6851-2025 Date of Decision:08.07.2025 Sumanpreet Kaur and Anr. …Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab and others …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Gursimran S. Bawa, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Addl., A.G., Punjab. Mr. J.S Bains, Advocate for respondents No.4 to 6 and 10. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) The petitioners have filed the instant petition with a prayer to direct the respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and also directing the respondents No.4 to 12 not to interfere in their lives and liberty. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already submitted a representation dated 23.06.2025 (Annexure P-4) to the Senior Superintendent of Police, District Amritsar (Rural) and he shall be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2 to look into their representation dated 23.06.2025 (Annexure P-4). Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3, at this stage. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Punjab, who is present in the Court,accepts notice on behalf of respondents HITESH 2025.07.08 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh CRWP-6851-2025 -2 No.1 to 3 and Mr. J.S Bains, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.4 to 6 and 10 by filing his Vakalatnama, which is taken on record. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. In view of the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without expressing anything on the merits and claim of the parties, respondent No.2–The Senior Superintendent of Police, District Amritsar (Rural) is directed to depute a senior officer to look into the representation dated 23.06.2025 (Annexure P-4) and after seeking a report, he may pass an appropriate orders, in accordance with law. This order shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the validity of the marriage of the parties. The parties mentioned in the petition or any other person mentioned in the petition shall be at liberty to take recourse to appropriate law, if any. With these observations, this petition is disposed of. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 08.07.2025 JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2025.07.08 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh