Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72056 (KAR)

SRI TARUN GAWRI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/16882/2022 · 2025-11-06

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44807 WP No. 16882 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.16882 OF 2022 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: 1. SRI TARUN GAWRI S/O PURUSHOTHAM GAWRI AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS R/A NO.10/648 INDIRA NAGAR LUCKNOW UTTAR PRADESH-226106. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SOFIYA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY UDUPI CEN CRIME PS REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU -560001. 2. SMT. VEENA W/O RAJESH ZGOWDA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/A 3-54/A, GODDE HOUSE NEELAVARA GRAMA Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44807 WP No. 16882 of 2022 BRAHMAVARA TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT-576213. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R1; R2 SERVICE OF NOTICE IS DISPENSED WITH) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE POLICE NOTICE DATED 12.7.2022 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Accepting the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the office objections are over-ruled. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. In this writ petition, the relief sought for by the petitioner is to quash the police notice dated 12.07.2022 issued to the petitioner by the respondent - Police, as per Annexure-A to the writ petition. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44807 WP No. 16882 of 2022 4. On careful consideration of the contents in the notice at Annexure-A, would indicate that, the respondent - Police have issued the notice to secure information with regard to Crime No.20/2022 registered by the CEN Crime Police Station, Udupi, for the offence punishable under Section 66(d) of the Information Technology Act. 3. In that view of the matter, no interference is called for in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7