141 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-33564-2025 Date of Decision:07.07.2025 Seema Jain and others …Petitioners vs. State of Punjab and others …Respondents Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present: Mr. Vaibhav Sehgal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Punjab. Mr. P.S Ahluwalia, Advocate with Mr. Udaiveer Singh Sidhu, Advocate for respondents No.9 to 11. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S with a prayer to issue directions to respondents No.2 and 3 not to conduct multiple enquiries in various complaints submitted by the private respondents. 2. On advance notice, Mr. Taurn Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Punjab has appeared before this Court on behalf of official respondents and on instructions from ASI Ranjit Singh submits that several complaints were received from both the sides. However, after holding enquiry, all the complaints submitted by the petitioner as well as the private respondents have been ordered to be consigned to record. He further contends that as on today, no complaint from either side is pending, for holding an enquiry. HITESH 2025.07.07 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh CRM-M-33564-2025 -2 3. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, no further directions are required and the petition is accordingly, disposed of. 4. Needless to observe that both the parties shall be at liberty to avail their legal remedies, if any, in accordance with law. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 07.07.2025 JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2025.07.07 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh