- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30450 MFA No. 6692 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.6692 OF 2024 (MV-I) BETWEEN: 1. SRI MANJAPPA S/O MANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE WORK, PRESENTLY NOT WORKING, R/O MALAHALLI VILLAGE, HARIHARTALUK DAVANAGERE DIST,-577601. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. RAMAKRISHNA N., ADVOCATE (ABSENT) AND: 1. HALESHAPPA P K S/O KURUVATHYAPPA, SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS I.E., HIS WIFE 1.(A) SMT. SAVITRAMMA W/O HALESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS OCC: AGRICULTURE, OWNER OF MARUTHI OMNI BEARING REG. NO.KA-17-Z-2498, R/O VADEYARAHATTUR, HONNALL TQ DAVANAGERE DIST-577243. 2. THE LEGAL CLAIMS MANAGER, IFFCO - TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30450 MFA No. 6692 of 2024 INSURANCE OF MARUTHI OMNI BEARING REG. NO.KA-17-Z-2498 R/O LAWYER ROAD, K.B. EXTENSION, DAVANAGERE-577002. 3. SRI. MAHEBUBSAB, S/O ABDUL REHAMAN SAB ERIHEMI AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS, OWNER OF BOLERO PICKUP BEARING REG NO. KA-27/B-3590 R/O TADAS VILLAGE, BYASDAGI TQ HAVERI DIST-581106. 4. THE LEGAL CLAIMS MANAGER, ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE CO. LTD., BOLERO PICKUP BEARING REG NO. KA-27/B-3590 102 AND 103, CENTER POINT, I FLOOR, OPP: SANJEEVI PRESS, NEW COTTON MARKET HUBLI- 580020. …RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DT.21.08.2019 PASSED IN MVC NO.979/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MEMBER, MACT-IV, DAVANGERE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION AND ETC., THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30450 MFA No. 6692 of 2024 ORAL ORDER No representation on appellant's side on call. The appeal was filed in the month of September, 2024 and till now office objections are not complied. Also there is no representation. These facts reveal that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the matter. Therefore, the appeal stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objection. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE AP CT:NJ List No.: 2 Sl No.: 22