134 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Civil Revision No. 4306 of 2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.04.2025 Mahabir Parsad ... Petitioner(s) Versus Smt. Manju Devi and Others ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal. Present: Mr. Eeshan Garg and Mr. Pawan Kumar Garg, Advocates for the petitioner(s). Mr. Sherry K. Singla, Advocate for the respondents. Anil Kshetarpal, J. 1. The petitioner herein is a tenant who has been ordered to be evicted on the ground of bonafide necessity of the landladies by both the Courts below. 2. The learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the landladies are in possession of various other properties. Hence, their necessity is not bonafide. 3. This aspect has been examined, in detail, by both the Courts below. As many as four landladies filed a joint petition seeking eviction of the tenant on the ground of bonafide necessity as they wanted to settle their children. Both the Courts below have found that the necessity of the landladies is bonafide. 4. The scope of interference in the revision petition is extremely DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2025.04.08 14:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Civil Revision No. 4306 of 2024 (O&M) 2 limited in view of the judgment passed by the five Judges Bench of the Supreme Court in Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited v. Dilbahar Singh (2014) 9 SCC 78. 5. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, no ground is made out to interfere with the impugned orders passed by both the Courts below. Hence, the present revision petition is dismissed. 6. The miscellaneous application(s) pending, if any, shall stand disposed of. (Anil Kshetarpal) Judge April 07, 2025 “DK” Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2025.04.08 14:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document