R/CR.MA/25000/2025 ORDER DATED: 01/12/2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - BEFORE CHARGESHEET) NO. 25000 of 2025 ======================================================== RUDRADUTTSINH ALIAS RUDRA GHANSHYAMSINH NOKUBHA VAGHELA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ======================================================== Appearance: MR M.NISAR VAIDHYA(3386) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR MOHDDANISH M BAREJIA(10612) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR LB DABHI ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ======================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIKHIL S. KARIEL Date : 01/12/2025 ORAL ORDER 1. Heard learned Advocate Mr. M.M. Barejia on behalf of the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. L.B. Dabhi on behalf of the respondent-State. 2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent-State. 3. The present applicant who has been arraigned as accused has preferred this application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11192011240597 of 2024 registered with Bopal Police Station, Ahmedabad for the offence punishable under Sections 65(a), 65(e) and 116B of the Gujarat Prohibition Act before filing of the charge-sheet more particularly the application preferred by the applicant having been rejected by the learned Trial Court. Page 1 of 4 R/CR.MA/25000/2025 ORDER DATED: 01/12/2025 4. Learned Advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant is behind bar since 10.11.2025. Learned Advocate on behalf of the applicant would submit that considering the nature of offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions. 5. The present application is vehemently objected to by learned Additional Public Prosecutor by submitting that looking to the nature of offence, role attributed to the present applicant and since the charge-sheet has not been filed, this Court may not interfere at this stage 6. This Court has heard learned Advocates for the respective parties and perused the FIR as well as order passed by learned Session Court as well as affidavit filed by the investigating officer before the learned Trial Court. 7. This Court has taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40. 8. This Court has also considered the following aspects: (i) The fact of the applicant stated to be the supplier of the liquor more particularly liquor being valued at Rs. 73,400/- that is not a very high quantity. (ii) The fact of co-accused behind whose house the liquor had been seized, having been considered for regular bail by learned Co- ordinate Bench vide order dated 11.10.2024 in Criminal Misc. Page 2 of 4 R/CR.MA/25000/2025 ORDER DATED: 01/12/2025 Application No. 20072 of 2024. (iii) While the present applicant is stated to have 7 antecedents yet considering the fact that the liquor in question was of not a large quantity and since a co-accused had been considered by the learned Co-ordinate Bench, this Court is inclined to release the applicant by imposing suitable conditions. 9. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the First Information Report, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail. 10. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11192011240597 of 2024 registered with Bopal Police Station, Ahmedabad on executing a bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall; [a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty; [b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution; [c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week; [d] not to leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Sessions Court concerned; [e] Mark presence in the concerned Police Station once in a week till charge-sheet is laid and thereafter once in a month for a period of six months between 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. R/CR.MA/25000/2025 ORDER DATED: 01/12/2025 [f] furnish the proposed address of residence to the I.O. and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residential address without prior intimation to the I.O. 11. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to take appropriate action in the matter. 12. Bail bond to be executed before the lower court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions in accordance with law. 13. At the stage of trial, the trial court shall not be influenced by any observations of this Court which are of preliminary nature made at this stage, only for the purpose of considering the application of the applicants for being released on regular bail. 14. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted. (NIKHIL S. KARIEL,J) NIRU Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: NIRU ROSHAN SHAH(HC00211), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 03/12/2025 12:18:19