Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:108461 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9083 of 2025 Petitioner :- Krishna Mohan Lal And 6 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jayprakash Tiwari,Jitendra Nath Tiwari,Rajesh Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned standing counsel for State- respondents. 2. Present petition has been filed seeking following relief:- "a). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to respondent authority to take into consideration the service period spent by the petitioners while undergoing training before they were appointed as constables for calculating the service for benefit of the financial up-gradation and one increment and also pay the arrears of it according to Government order dated 21/7/2011, 5/11/2014 & 3/8/2017 and revised the pay scale according 7th pay commission. b) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to calculate the service period of the petitioners from the date of appointment and granted the benefit of the financial up-gradation and one increment according to the G.O. 21/7/2011." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that for redressal of their grievances, petitioners have filed several representations before respondent No. 4, but no decision has been taken till date. Lastly, it is submitted that a direction may be issued to respondent No. 4 to decide the representation within a stipulated time. 4. Learned counsel for respondents submitted that petitioners may be directed to file fresh representation. Further, in case any such representation is filed, the same shall be considered and decided at the earliest. 5. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioners to move fresh representations along with certified copy of this order before respondent No. 4 within two weeks from today. In case any such representation is filed, respondent No. 4 is directed to decide the same in accordance with law maximum within a period of two months thereafter. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merits. It is upon respondent No. 4 to pass order after considering the relevant Rules as well as facts of the case. Order Date :- 9.7.2025 Nadeem Digitally signed by :- NADEEM AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad